Anecdotical evidence

This is the first post of this project, an initiative that has been brewing in the mind of the author for some time. The idea is to share the lessons and learnings obtained through therapy and the search for a personal truth.

A few years ago, the author experienced an event that he will call “the collapse.” It was just an ordinary day when a conversation with a friend revealed the limits of knowledge and the ability of oneself to arrive at “the truth.” For more than 30 years, he had lived in a world of scientific positivism and modernity, that perspective collapsed and forced him to rethink his own existence.

This post and the project itself is an invitation to reflect on the importance of questioning beliefs and truths, to explore different perspectives and to bring knowledge gathered from different sources.

The author hopes that through this website, visitors can find tools and resources to improve their mental and emotional well-being, and perhaps question their own truth.

Deconstructing the World

Lacan believed that language is the primary way in which human beings construct their reality, and that deconstruction helps to reveal the inconsistencies and contradictions in language, allowing for a deeper understanding of human nature. Lacan’s theory of deconstruction is very complex and requires a great deal of study to be fully understood. The idea is that deconstruction helps to dismantle the underlying structures of meaning in language, allowing for a deeper understanding of human nature.

Some critics of Jacques Lacan’s theory of deconstruction include Jürgen Habermas, Jean-François Lyotard, Jean-Michel Rabaté, Slavoj Žižek, Alain Badiou, and Jacques-Alain Miller. These critics have questioned different aspects of Lacan’s theory. One of the main criticisms is that his approach is very complex and abstract, making it difficult to understand and apply in practice. Additionally, some critics argue that his approach is based on a distorted understanding of the human psyche and the structure of language. Another criticism is that Lacan focuses on the unconscious and subjective mental processes, meaning that his theory is not generalizable to all people and situations.

Some critics have also questioned the empirical validity of Lacan’s theory, as it is not based on scientific research and has not been subject to rigorous empirical studies.

Finally, some critics argue that Lacan’s theory is overly influenced by his training in continental philosophy and his focus on literature and art, making it a theory that is not relevant to clinical practice and psychological research.

Despite the criticisms, Jacques Lacan’s theory of deconstruction has been widely influential in various fields such as literature, art, philosophy, and psychology. Many scholars and academics have used the term “deconstruct” to analyze and break down different texts, works of art, and social structures. Additionally, some theorists and critics have adapted Lacan’s theory to apply it to their own field of study and have found it to be a useful tool for understanding and critiquing various topics.

In the context of positivist truth and scientific materialism, one could use the tool of deconstruction to analyze and question the underlying assumptions of these perspectives.

Despite criticisms, Jacques Lacan’s theory of deconstruction has been widely influential in various fields such as literature, art, philosophy, and psychology. Many scholars and academics have used the term “deconstruction” to analyze and break down various texts, works of art, and social structures. Additionally, some theorists and critics have adapted Lacan’s theory to apply it to their own field of study and have found it to be a useful tool for understanding and criticizing various topics.

In the context of positivist truth and scientific materialism, one could use the tool of deconstruction to analyze and question the underlying assumptions of these perspectives. For example, one could analyze how positivist truth is based on the idea of objective and scientific knowledge that is independent of subjective experience and how this idea is itself a social and historical construct. One could also question how scientific materialism is based on the idea that the physical world is the only true world and how this idea excludes other forms of knowledge and experience.

Instead of accepting these perspectives as universal truths, deconstruction invites one to look more closely at the structures of thought that support them and question the underlying assumptions. This can allow for a greater understanding of the complexity and multiplicity of truth and a greater openness to different perspectives and forms of knowledge.

The process of deconstructing one’s own knowledge can help a person question their beliefs and accepted truths, which in turn can lead to a greater understanding of oneself and the world. Additionally, by questioning the underlying structures of knowledge, it can help people develop a broader perspective and have a more complete view of reality. At the same time, if a person is stripped of their beliefs and life purposes, they may feel lost and confused, have difficulty finding a sense of direction and purpose in their life, which can lead to problems such as depression and anxiety. Without a clear understanding of who they are and what they want, people can feel isolated and without purpose. It is important to note that deconstruction should not be viewed as a process of elimination of truths and beliefs, but as a process of questioning and critical reflection on them. The goal should be to find a more complete and profound truth, not to strip oneself of it.

There are several tools and approaches that can be useful in the search for a more complete and profound truth. Some of them include:

Meditation and the practice of mindfulness: These techniques can help develop the ability to be present and attentive in the present moment, which can lead to a greater understanding of oneself and the world around us.

Therapy and coaching: Through a therapeutic or coaching relationship, one can work with a professional to explore and process thoughts, feelings, and beliefs that may be hindering one’s ability to reach a deeper truth.

Reading and study: Reading texts and books on philosophy, psychology, spirituality, and other disciplines can provide a greater understanding of concepts and theories related to truth.

Exploring different perspectives and cultures: Learning about different cultures and traditions can provide a greater understanding of the diversity of truths and perspectives existing in the world.

Reflection: Taking time to reflect on one’s own beliefs and perspectives can help identify limitations and biases that may be hindering the ability to reach a deeper truth.

It is important to remember that the search for truth is a continuous and constantly evolving process, and that multiple tools and approaches may be required to reach a deeper and more complete understanding of truth.